Hubbards andre kone

Scientologikirken er ikke særlig begeistret Sara Northrup, Hubbards andre kone, og detaljene om ektemannen i hennes dagbøker. Hun beskriver en ganske annen mann enn det visjonære geniet som avslørte Universets hemmeligheter.

I Hubbards offisielle biografi eksisterer ikke Sara, som vi f.eks. ser i dette retusjerte fotografiet:

Hubbards andre kone spiller derimot en sentral rolle i Gibneys film, Going Clear. Snuser man litt nærmere på ekteskapet mellom Norhrup og Hubbard, finner man mye grums. De møtte hverandre hos okkultisten og og Aleister Crowley-tilhengeren Jack Parsons, hvor seksualmagiske ritualer var hverdagskost. Dere kan lese mer om dette her.

Det er derfor, ifølge Tony Ortega, litt underlig at Scientologikirken nå kritiserer Northrup som kilde i Gibneys film. Nettopp ved å kritisere henne, innrømmer de at hun har eksistert, skriver Ortega:

Anyway, we thought it was really interesting that all of these months after Going Clear first premiered at the Sundance Film Festival, and with Oscar season approaching, Scientology is still putting out videos attacking the documentary, and now, David Miscavige and his Golden Era filmmakers are apparently desperate enough to go there — yes, they’re attacking Sara Northrup.

But not by name! Here, check out the transcript of how the new film attacks Gibney’s use of Northrup without uttering the name of She Who Must Not Exist…

Gibney decided to tell the story of the founder of a worldwide religion by ferreting out a source even a tabloid journalist would consider “questionable” at best.

His “source’s” credentials:

Gold digger…

… fabricator of misinformation to the media…

… and accessory to forgery – knowingly filing documents in court later proven to have been counterfeited by her attorney.

All a matter of public record…

And all in a sleazy attempt to take over the Hubbard Dianetics Foundation for personal gain.

In other words, an opportunist, just like Alex Gibney…

1 Like

Gibney decided to tell the story of the founder of a worldwide religion by ferreting out a source even a tabloid journalist would consider “questionable” at best.

His “source’s” credentials:

Gold digger…

… fabricator of misinformation to the media…

… and accessory to forgery – knowingly filing documents in court later proven to have been counterfeited by her attorney.

Dette må være beviset, bare en helt ekte religion utrykker seg på den måten!

1 Like